sasabuild.blogg.se

1. #Flashfxp 5 sn install
2. #Flashfxp 5 sn software
3. #Flashfxp 5 sn code
4. #Flashfxp 5 sn free
5. #Flashfxp 5 sn mac

It's not "free" market if the market is not free to choose. Does your company want to set up a string of Dell servers running Linux? Guess what? It has to buy a copy of Windows for each machine anyway. Imagine that! Microsoft has found a way to sell hundreds of millions of copies of its products to people who don't want them.

#Flashfxp 5 sn mac

Oopsie - that's a Big Mac and a Pepsi, too. Don't like being forced to buy a Pepsi you don't want? Then go to McD's. Just want a taco? Nope - taco and Pepsi for you. If I want to go to TB and buy a burrito, I have to buy a burrito and a Pepsi. It's that every Taco Bell customer is forced to buy a Pepsi with every meal, even if he doesn't want it. It's not just that Taco only offers Pepsi products.

#Flashfxp 5 sn install

Just want to wipe Windows and install Linux? You have to pay an extra $50 anyway, because MS' heavy-handedness forces you to. An eMachine's $200? Without Windows, it'd be $150, but just try buying it without Windows. The point, as far as I'm concerned, is this: if I've already got XP, or - hard to imagine, I know - I actually don't want the thing, I'm SOL.

I would first by a freak'en E-Machine for like $200 and then you would get not only Windows XP, but hard ware too. Yeah, OK - I'm coming to this conversation about a year late oh well. I try not to let that get in the way of my thinking for instance, I prefer Firefox over IE, but Microsoft Office over Star or Open Office.

#Flashfxp 5 sn software

I just think the way they do things degrades their software as a whole, and also makes people think worse of them, which cascades onto a worse opinion of their products. Of course, Microsoft's lawyers will delay that as long as they can, but hey, whadda ya gonna do aboudit?ītw, I personally think Microsoft has some great software (even if some of it wasn't really theirs to begin with), and that, taken separately, each of them has merit. Many people already see how bad it's gotten and vouch for a fissure of the company, which I think should happen too. Copyrighting and smart business ventures are entirely different things. (Huh?) Anyway, monopolizing is neither legal nor right. But they don't and they shouldn't, yet they act like they do and they can. If Microsoft made their own machines, they could do whatever the heck they wanted to them, I agree.

#Flashfxp 5 sn code

Trust us."Īnd even if they did make Windows open source, I don't think anybody would be able to understand the spaghetti code it's become over years of trying to fix stuff they didn't even create. The installation should be similar to the Linux graphical, which gives you far more control over your OS then "Tell us your name and we'll do the rest. XP is not IE, Microsoft Office, or any of the other crap they sell along with it. (Which also forces computer manufacturers to up their prices)Īnyway, all we need to do is split Microsoft up, so they won't do stupid things like deviating from the modular system, and so they won't push their weight around.

I got Redhat 9.0 for ten bucks, and it has the same as or more functionality than XP, which currently has a list price of 100 greenbacks. One huge mistake they made was integrating IE into the shell, then introducing all the bugs and fallacies as "features." Oh no, was Netscape actually starting to get competitive? God forbid! Now, XP Home Edition comes with tons of Microsoft software already on it, and in their warped thinking they think this gross injustice on our choice as consumers actually merits a huge increase in price. What companies like Dell and Emachines do shouldn't concern them, and yet they exercise all the power at their disposal to force them to distribute XP the way they want. We can push everyone around to get what we want, and hey while we're at it let's go to any lengths to keep that monopoly, hindering the economy and totally destroying the concept of a free market." But they should at least stick to what they are - a software company. It's basically, "Hey, we've got a monopoly. However, their market strategy does indeed suck. Heh, well I don't think anyone, not even Microsoft in all it's evil, should be forced to go open source. IP4_1.msi" MM="MM" REBOOT="ReallySuppress" /q Nero6xxxxx.exe /SILENT /NeinREBOOT /SN=xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx /WRITE_SN Klmc101.exe /silent /loadinf=".\silent.inf" Setup.exe /silent /loadinf=".\silent.inf" SETUP.EXE /s /v"/qr REBOOT=Suppress REBOOTPROMPT=S"Īvk2004full.exe -s -a -s -f1"%systemdrive%\install\AVK2004\setup.iss" ACDSee 5.0 Standard.msi" /QN SLL_LICENSENUMBER=XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESSĪlcohol 120% - reg file schreiben und einfügenįritzdsl_1_05_03.exe -s -a -s -f1setup.issĭiskeeper 8.0 - Laufwerk c: gleich danach defragmentieren mit Diskeeper